I think I’ve finally figured out one of the things that bothers me most about politics right now.
It’s not even that people disagree with me.
I actually like when people disagree with me. It makes life interesting. I don’t need everyone sitting around nodding their heads at everything I say.
What bothers me is when someone’s political beliefs become so intertwined with their identity that admitting they’re wrong becomes almost impossible.
Because then politics isn’t:
“I believe this policy is better.”
It becomes:
“I am one of the good people.”
And that’s a completely different thing.
Once you’ve convinced yourself that your political beliefs are proof of your moral goodness, questioning those beliefs suddenly feels personal.
If I admit my side was wrong, what does that say about me?
If I admit the person I’ve been defending actually did something terrible, maybe I’m not as compassionate as I thought.
If I admit someone from my political tribe is a hypocrite, maybe I’m a hypocrite for defending them.
If I acknowledge that the other side occasionally has a legitimate point, does that mean I’m betraying my people?
And THAT is where I think things get really weird.
Because I’ve watched progressive people bend themselves into absolute pretzels to defend things they would find completely reprehensible if the political labels were reversed.
I’ve watched people demand that we “believe women” until the woman happens to be accusing someone they politically support.
I’ve watched people scream about systemic injustice while excusing horrific individual behavior because the perpetrator belongs to a group they’ve decided is oppressed.
I’ve watched people preach compassion for criminals while having absolutely zero compassion for their victims.
I’ve watched people demand tolerance while treating anyone who disagrees with them as morally defective.
And I’ve watched people insist that we must respect someone’s identity while simultaneously telling everyone else that their understanding of reality is hateful and invalid.
That’s not tolerance.
That’s “agree with me or you’re a bad person.”
And here’s the part that really fascinates me:
Some of these same people seem genuinely convinced they’re the most open-minded people in the room.
That’s the hypocrisy.
And before the conservatives start high-fiving themselves…
We’re not innocent.
I’ve watched conservatives do the exact same damn thing.
We talk about personal responsibility until one of our own screws up.
We talk about family values while excusing terrible behavior from politicians we like.
We complain about government censorship while wanting to silence things we find offensive.
We demand law and order until the person breaking the law is someone we’re politically sympathetic toward.
We scream “fake news” when the facts don’t fit our preferred narrative.
Same disease.
Different symptoms.
Because the real addiction isn’t liberalism or conservatism.
It’s moral identity.
There is something incredibly intoxicating about believing you’re on the right side of history.
You get to be the enlightened one.
The compassionate one.
The defender.
The person who “gets it.”
And once that becomes part of your identity, you don’t necessarily care about being right anymore.
You care about being good.
And those aren’t always the same thing.
Sometimes the most morally courageous thing you can do is say:
“I was wrong.”
Sometimes it’s:
“I don’t like this person, but they’re right about this.”
Sometimes it’s:
“The person I voted for screwed up.”
Sometimes it’s:
“The person I disagree with isn’t evil. They just see the world differently than I do.”
And sometimes it’s:
“Holy shit…I’ve been defending something I wouldn’t tolerate if the other side did it.”
That’s growth.
That’s intellectual honesty.
And honestly, I think we need a lot more of it.
Because I don’t want a political identity that makes me feel like I’m one of the good people.
I want beliefs that can survive being questioned.
I want to be able to change my mind without feeling like I’ve betrayed my entire identity.
I want to be able to call bullshit when my own side is full of shit.
And I want to be able to recognize something good when it comes from the other side without feeling like I’ve joined the enemy.
Maybe that’s the real problem.
We’re so busy trying to prove we’re the good guys that we’ve stopped asking whether what we’re actually defending is good.
And those are two very different questions.
Being a good person isn’t about always being on the right side.
It’s about being willing to admit when you’re not.
